
In the several analyses published so far in this section, we managed to draw readers’ attention to various aspects of manipulation through mass media. Media expert Ion Bunduchi, for example, examined headlines in the media. They often have elements that can mislead or send a manipulating message that is contrary to reality. In another material this author referred to the presumption of innocence, a principle that is often ignored by journalists, although the role of the media is to inform, and not give verdicts.
Cristina Mogildea, trainer at the School of Advanced Journalism, explained why it is important for the public to read materials in the press between the lines. In her two analyses, she proved by concrete examples that some journalistic texts can manipulate very subtly, through words and expressions that distort the truth and suggest certain deductions to readers, instead of presenting objective facts and let readers make their own opinion based on those facts.
The media education analyses published so far are now available on Media Azi:
”Vinovăția” prezumției de nevinovăție
Manipularea prin cuvinte: Sinonimele perverse
Etică vs profit (2): De fapt, ce este manipularea?
Manipularea prin cuvinte: scurt pe două litere
Ce (nu) ne spun titlurile de presă
Un exerciţiu de alungare a cenzorului din noi
The “Media education: analyses” section has been launched as a result of the need to promote critical and responsible media consumption among citizens, so that they correctly search for information and be aware of the risk of manipulation.
Materials are published within the “Freedom of expression and mass media development in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe and Northern Caucasus” project, implemented by the IJC in the period of May to November 2015 with the support of Deutsche Welle Akademie and funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany.