Thus, the court concluded that the charge imputed to Victor Sofroni through the ordinance on the commencement of contravention proceedings is presumed declarative, not corroborated by clear evidence. Court also found that during the phone call Victor Sofroni did not warn Rezina Police Inspectorate about the images he had received, but instead asked it to prove or disprove this information. The judgement is final, but it may be challenged in the Chisinau Court of Appeal within 15 days, via Orhei Court.
Note that media NGOs called the reasons for initiating these proceedings and the legal classification of the alleged ‘contravention’ absurd, given that the journalist Victor Sofroni just asked the police to verify the information he received from unknown persons. They also requested to close the case.
The Independent Journalism Center provides the journalist with legal assistance in this case.
See also: The Orhei Court Annulled Prosecutors’ Ordinances in the Case of Journalist Victor Sofroni Who Was Accused of False Police Call